Self-adjusting offspring population sizes outperform fixed parameters on the cliff function
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5075414
Recommendations
- An improved evolution strategy with adaptive population size
- Malthusian parameters, reproductive values and change under selection in self fertilizing age-structured populations
- Nature computation with a self-adaptive dynamic control strategy of population size
- Size-number trade-off and optimal offspring size for offspring produced sequentially using a fixed amount of reserves
- Adaptive population models for offspring populations and parallel evolutionary algorithms
- Evolutionarily stable strategies depending on population density
- Evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphic self-replicator population with a finite population size and hyper mutation rate
Cited in
(10)- When move acceptance selection hyper-heuristics outperform metropolis and elitist evolutionary algorithms and when not
- The “One-fifth Rule” with Rollbacks for Self-Adjustment of the Population Size in the (1 + (λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm
- Self-adaptation Can Improve the Noise-tolerance of Evolutionary Algorithms
- OneMax is not the easiest function for fitness improvements
- More precise runtime analyses of non-elitist evolutionary algorithms in uncertain environments
- Self-adjusting population sizes for non-elitist evolutionary algorithms: why success rates matter
- Runtime analysis for permutation-based evolutionary algorithms
- Self-adjusting offspring population sizes outperform fixed parameters on the Cliff function
- Plus strategies are exponentially slower for planted optima of random height
- The compact genetic algorithm struggles on cliff functions
This page was built for publication: Self-adjusting offspring population sizes outperform fixed parameters on the cliff function
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5075414)
