Two methods for determining properly effcient solutions with a minimum upper bound for trade-offs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5080781
DOI10.2298/FIL1906551HzbMath1499.90195MaRDI QIDQ5080781
Behnam Hozzar, Behrouz Daneshian, G. Tohidi
Publication date: 31 May 2022
Published in: Filomat (Search for Journal in Brave)
multiobjective optimizationtrade-offproper efficiencyKuhn-Tucker conditionsweighted sum scalarization
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Multiobjective optimization. Interactive and evolutionary approaches
- An improved definition of proper efficiency for vector maximization with respect to cones
- Proper efficiency with respect to cones
- Nonlinear multiobjective optimization
- Foundations of bilevel programming
- Trade-off analysis approach for interactive nonlinear multiobjective optimization
- Linear and conic scalarizations for obtaining properly efficient solutions in multiobjective optimization
- Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization
- An upper bound on properly efficient solutions in multiobjective optimization
- Proper Efficient Points for Maximizations with Respect to Cones
- On Cone-Efficiency, Cone-Convexity and Cone-Compactness
- Characterization of substantially and quasi-substantially efficient solutions in multiobjective optimization problems
- Quasi-proper efficiency: a quantitative enhanced efficiency
- Multicriteria Optimization
- Letter to the Editor—Improper Solutions of the Vector Maximum Problem
This page was built for publication: Two methods for determining properly effcient solutions with a minimum upper bound for trade-offs