A comparison of four methods of inverse prediction

DOI10.1080/03610918.2019.1601217MaRDI QIDQ5087997zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Christine G. Watters, Lynn Roy La Motte

Publication date 4 July 2022

Published in Communications in Statistics. Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1601217

zbMATH Keywords

calibration methodsconfidence setsforensic entomologypostmortem intervalsrejection rates

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• A statistical method to construct confidence sets on carrion insect age from development stage
• Approximate F-tests of multiple degree of freedom hypotheses in generalized least squares analyses of unbalanced split-plot experiments
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3578234 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3806768 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inverse prediction for heteroscedastic response using mixed models software
• Inverse prediction for multivariate mixed models with standard software
• Length of Confidence Intervals
• On inverse prediction in mixed linear models
• Statistical Calibration: A Review

Cited in

(1)

• Nomogram for sample size calculation in assessing validity of a new method based on a regression line

This page was built for publication: A comparison of four methods of inverse prediction

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5087997)