Confounding adjustment methods for multi-level treatment comparisons under lack of positivity and unknown model specification

DOI10.1080/02664763.2021.1911966MaRDI QIDQ5093035zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors S. Arona Diop, Thierry Duchesne, Steven G. Cumming, A. Diop, Denis Talbot

Publication date 26 July 2022

Published in Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2021.1911966

zbMATH Keywords

confounding adjustmentmachine learningmulti-level treatmentplasmode simulationsimulation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics (62Pxx)

Cites work

• A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
• Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting
• Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
• Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
• Demystifying Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
• Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: a review and new ideas
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3624650 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1487685 (Why is no real title available?)
• Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
• Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
• Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions
• Polychotomous Regression
• Propensity score matching and subclassification in observational studies with multi‐level treatments
• Propensity score weighting for causal inference with multiple treatments
• Statistical causal inferences and their applications in public health research
• Super Learner
• The performance of estimators based on the propensity score

Cited in

(4)

• On negative outcome control of unobserved confounding as a generalization of difference-in-differences
• Evaluation and comparison of covariate balance metrics in studies with time-dependent confounding
• Guidelines and best practices for the use of targeted maximum likelihood and machine learning when estimating causal effects of exposures on time-to-event outcomes
• Using machine learning to improve control for confounding in the dynamic weighted ordinary least squares estimator of optimal adaptive treatment strategies

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• geepack
• SuperLearner
• randomForest
• polspline

This page was built for publication: Confounding adjustment methods for multi-level treatment comparisons under lack of positivity and unknown model specification

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5093035)