Complexity dichotomy for list-5-coloring with a forbidden induced subgraph

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5099103

DOI10.1137/21M1443352zbMATH Open1496.05051arXiv2105.01787OpenAlexW3198462604MaRDI QIDQ5099103FDOQ5099103


Authors: Sepehr Hajebi, Yanjia Li, Sophie Spirkl Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 31 August 2022

Published in: SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: For a positive integer r and graphs G and H, we denote by G+H the disjoint union of G and H, and by rH the union of r mutually disjoint copies of H. Also, we say G is H-free if H is not isomorphic to an induced subgraph of G. We use Pt to denote the path on t vertices. For a fixed positive integer k, the List-k-Coloring Problem is to decide, given a graph G and a list L(v)subseteq1,ldots,k of colors assigned to each vertex v of G, whether G admits a proper coloring phi with phi(v)inL(v) for every vertex v of G, and the k-Coloring Problem is the List-k-Coloring Problem restricted to instances with L(v)=1,ldots,k for every vertex v of G. We prove that for every positive integer r, the List-5-Coloring Problem restricted to rP3-free graphs can be solved in polynomial time. Together with known results, this gives a complete dichotomy for the complexity of the List-5-Coloring Problem restricted to H-free graphs: For every graph H, assuming PeqNP, the List-5-Coloring Problem restricted to H-free graphs can be solved in polynomial time if and only if H is an induced subgraph of either rP3 or P5+rP1 for some positive integer r. As a hardness counterpart, we also show that the k-Coloring Problem restricted to rP4-free graphs is NP-complete for all kgeq5 and rgeq2.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01787




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: Complexity dichotomy for list-5-coloring with a forbidden induced subgraph

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5099103)