Initial Conflicts for Transformation Rules with Nested Application Conditions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5100729

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-51372-6_7zbMATH Open1502.68156arXiv2005.05901OpenAlexW3038088247MaRDI QIDQ5100729FDOQ5100729

Fernando Orejas, Leen Lambers

Publication date: 1 September 2022

Published in: Graph Transformation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We extend the theory of initial conflicts in the framework of M-adhesive categories to transformation rules with ACs. We first show that for rules with ACs, conflicts are in general neither inherited from a bigger context any more, nor is it possible to find a finite and complete subset of finite conflicts as illustrated for the category of graphs. We define initial conflicts to be special so-called symbolic transformation pairs, and show that they are minimally complete (and in the case of graphs also finite) in this symbolic way. We show that initial conflicts represent a proper subset of critical pairs again. We moreover demonstrate that (analogous to the case of rules without ACs) for each conflict a unique initial conflict exists representing it. We conclude with presenting a sufficient condition illustrating important special cases for rules with ACs, where we do not only have initial conflicts being complete in a symbolic way, but also find complete (and in the case of graphs also finite) subsets of conflicts in the classical sense.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05901





Cites Work


Cited In (3)






This page was built for publication: Initial Conflicts for Transformation Rules with Nested Application Conditions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5100729)