Smaller parameters for vertex cover kernelization

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5111879

DOI10.4230/LIPICS.IPEC.2017.20zbMATH Open1443.68072arXiv1711.04604OpenAlexW2963326511MaRDI QIDQ5111879FDOQ5111879


Authors: Eva-Maria C. Hols, Stefan Kratsch Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 May 2020

Abstract: We revisit the topic of polynomial kernels for Vertex Cover relative to structural parameters. Our starting point is a recent paper due to Fomin and Str{o}mme [WG 2016] who gave a kernel with mathcalO(|X|12) vertices when X is a vertex set such that each connected component of GX contains at most one cycle, i.e., X is a modulator to a pseudoforest. We strongly generalize this result by using modulators to d-quasi-forests, i.e., graphs where each connected component has a feedback vertex set of size at most d, and obtain kernels with mathcalO(|X|3d+9) vertices. Our result relies on proving that minimal blocking sets in a d-quasi-forest have size at most d+2. This bound is tight and there is a related lower bound of mathcalO(|X|d+2epsilon) on the bit size of kernels. In fact, we also get bounds for minimal blocking sets of more general graph classes: For d-quasi-bipartite graphs, where each connected component can be made bipartite by deleting at most d vertices, we get the same tight bound of d+2 vertices. For graphs whose connected components each have a vertex cover of cost at most d more than the best fractional vertex cover, which we call d-quasi-integral, we show that minimal blocking sets have size at most 2d+2, which is also tight. Combined with existing randomized polynomial kernelizations this leads to randomized polynomial kernelizations for modulators to d-quasi-bipartite and d-quasi-integral graphs. There are lower bounds of mathcalO(|X|d+2epsilon) and mathcalO(|X|2d+2epsilon) for the bit size of such kernels.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04604




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (11)





This page was built for publication: Smaller parameters for vertex cover kernelization

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5111879)