How hard is it to predict sandpiles on lattices? A survey
DOI10.3233/FI-2020-1879zbMATH Open1445.37006arXiv1909.12150MaRDI QIDQ5114215FDOQ5114215
Publication date: 21 June 2020
Published in: Fundamenta Informaticae (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12150
Recommendations
Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory (60K35) Dynamical systems and their relations with probability theory and stochastic processes (37A50) Dynamical aspects of statistical mechanics (37A60) Simulation of dynamical systems (37M05) Lattice systems (Ising, dimer, Potts, etc.) and systems on graphs arising in equilibrium statistical mechanics (82B20) Dynamics of disordered systems (random Ising systems, etc.) in time-dependent statistical mechanics (82C44) Complexity of computation (including implicit computational complexity) (03D15)
Cited In (8)
- Embedding arbitrary Boolean circuits into fungal automata
- Freezing sandpiles and Boolean threshold networks: equivalence and complexity
- Predictability and scaling in a BTW sandpile on a self-similar lattice
- The computational complexity of one-dimensional sandpiles
- New Computational Paradigms
- Embedding arbitrary Boolean circuits into fungal automata
- HOW SIZE OF TARGET AVALANCHES INFLUENCES PREDICTION EFFICIENCY
- Sandpile toppling on Penrose tilings: identity and isotropic dynamics
This page was built for publication: How hard is it to predict sandpiles on lattices? A survey
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5114215)