Conjoint Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral for Heterogeneous Product Sets

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_5zbMATH Open1475.28016arXiv1603.08142OpenAlexW2316925577MaRDI QIDQ5115727FDOQ5115727

Mikhail Timonin

Publication date: 18 August 2020

Published in: Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We propose an axiomatization of the Choquet integral model for the general case of a heterogeneous product set $X=X_{1}imesldotsimes{X}_n$. In MCDA elements of $X$ are interpreted as alternatives, characterized by criteria taking values from the sets $X_i$. Previous axiomatizations of the Choquet integral have been given for particular cases $X=Y^n$ and $X=mathbb{R}^n$. However, within multicriteria context such identicalness, hence commensurateness, of criteria cannot be assumed a priori. This constitutes the major difference of this paper from the earlier axiomatizations. In particular, the notion of "comonotonicity" cannot be used in a heterogeneous structure, as there does not exist a "built-in" order between elements of sets $X_i$ and $X_j$. However, such an order is implied by the representation model. Our approach does not assume commensurateness of criteria. We construct the representation and study its uniqueness properties.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08142

Recommendations

• Axiomatic characterizations of the Choquet integral
• Choquet integral on multisets
• Axiomatizations of the discrete Choquet integral and extensions
• Decomposition-integral: unifying Choquet and the concave integrals
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral in the context of multiple criteria decision making without any commensurability assumption
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral and its utility functions without any commensurability assumption
• SET-VALUED CHOQUET-PETTIS INTEGRALS
• Set-valued Choquet integrals revisited
• Axiomatizations of signed discrete Choquet integrals
• Aggregation of Choquet integrals

zbMATH Keywords

MCDAdecision theoryChoquet integralmulti-criteria decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fuzzy measure theory (28E10)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid
• Preference Foundations for Nonexpected Utility: A Generalized and Simplified Technique
• Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. I: The algebraic approach
• Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• An Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral and Its Utility Functions without Any Commensurability Assumption

Cited In (4)

• On the interpretation of the interaction index between criteria in a Choquet integral model
• Necessary and possible interaction between criteria in a 2-additive Choquet integral model
• On the Robustness of the Sign of Nonadditivity Index in a Choquet Integral Model
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral in the context of multiple criteria decision making without any commensurability assumption

This page was built for publication: Conjoint Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral for Heterogeneous Product Sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5115727)