Conjoint Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral for Heterogeneous Product Sets

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_5MaRDI QIDQ5115727zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Mikhail Timonin

Publication date 18 August 2020

Published in Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08142

zbMATH Keywords

MCDAdecision theoryChoquet integralmulti-criteria decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fuzzy measure theory (28E10)

Abstract: We propose an axiomatization of the Choquet integral model for the general case of a heterogeneous product set $X=X_{1}imesldotsimes{X}_n$. In MCDA elements of $X$ are interpreted as alternatives, characterized by criteria taking values from the sets $X_i$. Previous axiomatizations of the Choquet integral have been given for particular cases $X=Y^n$ and $X=mathbb{R}^n$. However, within multicriteria context such identicalness, hence commensurateness, of criteria cannot be assumed a priori. This constitutes the major difference of this paper from the earlier axiomatizations. In particular, the notion of "comonotonicity" cannot be used in a heterogeneous structure, as there does not exist a "built-in" order between elements of sets $X_i$ and $X_j$. However, such an order is implied by the representation model. Our approach does not assume commensurateness of criteria. We construct the representation and study its uniqueness properties.

Recommendations

• Axiomatic characterizations of the Choquet integral
• Choquet integral on multisets
• Axiomatizations of the discrete Choquet integral and extensions
• Decomposition-integral: unifying Choquet and the concave integrals
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral in the context of multiple criteria decision making without any commensurability assumption
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral and its utility functions without any commensurability assumption
• SET-VALUED CHOQUET-PETTIS INTEGRALS
• Set-valued Choquet integrals revisited
• Axiomatizations of signed discrete Choquet integrals
• Aggregation of Choquet integrals

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5556707 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3769296 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3366923 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3395595 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3087284 (Why is no real title available?)
• A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid
• Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. I: The algebraic approach
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral and its utility functions without any commensurability assumption
• Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules
• Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities
• Preference Foundations for Nonexpected Utility: A Generalized and Simplified Technique
• Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity

Cited in

(5)

• On the interpretation of the interaction index between criteria in a Choquet integral model
• Necessary and possible interaction between criteria in a 2-additive Choquet integral model
• On the Robustness of the Sign of Nonadditivity Index in a Choquet Integral Model
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral and its utility functions without any commensurability assumption
• An axiomatization of the Choquet integral in the context of multiple criteria decision making without any commensurability assumption

This page was built for publication: Conjoint Axiomatization of the Choquet Integral for Heterogeneous Product Sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5115727)