Neologicist foundations: inconsistent abstraction principles and part-whole

DOI10.1515/9783110657883-014zbMATH Open1465.03032OpenAlexW2989931657MaRDI QIDQ5115864FDOQ5115864

Benjamin Siskind, Paolo Mancosu

Publication date: 21 August 2020

Published in: Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110657883-014

Recommendations

• Which Abstraction Principles are Acceptable? Some Limitative Results
• Abstraction and four kinds of invariance (or: what's so logical about counting)
• Abstraction and set theory
• Categories for the neologicist
• New V, ZF and Abstraction†

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Foundations of classical theories (including reverse mathematics) (03B30)

Cited In (3)

• Euclid's common notions and the theory of equivalence
• Cantor's Abstractionism and Hume's Principle
• A NOTE ON CHOICE PRINCIPLES IN SECOND-ORDER LOGIC

This page was built for publication: Neologicist foundations: inconsistent abstraction principles and part-whole

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5115864)