Why does Frege care whether Julius Caesar is a number? Section 10 of basic laws and the context principle

DOI10.1093/OSO/9780198712084.003.0005MaRDI QIDQ5116953zbMATHzbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Joan Weiner

Publication date 19 August 2020

Published in Essays on Frege's Basic Laws of Arithmetic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198712084.003.0005

zbMATH Keywords

Fregerealismmetaphysicscontext principlepermutation argumentCaesar\textit{Grundgesetze} Section 10value-range

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)

Recommendations

• The status of value-ranges in the argument of \textit{Basic laws of arithmetic} I {\S}10
• Frege's introduction of value-ranges: a reading of \textit{Grundgesetze} \S\S29--31
• Frege on referentiality and Julius Caesar in \textit{Grundgesetze} Section 10
• Fregean abstraction, referential indeterminacy and the logical foundations of arithmetic
• The semantics of value-range names and Frege's proof of referentiality

Cited in

(5)

• The semantics of value-range names and Frege's proof of referentiality
• Stipulations Missing Axioms in Frege's Grundgesetze der Arithmetik
• Frege on referentiality and Julius Caesar in \textit{Grundgesetze} Section 10
• The status of value-ranges in the argument of \textit{Basic laws of arithmetic} I {\S}10
• Frege's introduction of value-ranges: a reading of \textit{Grundgesetze} \S\S29--31

This page was built for publication: Why does Frege care whether Julius Caesar is a number? Section 10 of basic laws and the context principle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5116953)