Distances between formal theories
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5117596
Abstract: In the literature, there have been several methods and definitions for working out if two theories are "equivalent" (essentially the same) or not. In this article, we do something subtler. We provide means to measure distances (and explore connections) between formal theories. We introduce two main notions for such distances. The first one is that of extit{axiomatic distance}, but we argue that it might be of limited interest. The more interesting and widely applicable notion is that of extit{conceptual distance} which measures the minimum number of concepts that distinguish two theories. For instance, we use conceptual distance to show that relativistic and classical kinematics are distinguished by one concept only. We also develop further notions of distance, and we include a number of suggestions for applying and extending our project.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1215499 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5066367 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3302923 (Why is no real title available?)
- A logic road from special relativity to general relativity
- An axiomatic basis for computer programming
- Axiomatic Definitions of Programming Languages
- Comparing classical and relativistic kinematics in first-order logic
- Complete axiomatizations for quantum actions
- Completeness in the theory of types
- Cylindric algebras. Part II
- Epimorphisms in cylindric algebras and definability in finite variable logic
- First order logic without equality on relativized semantics
- Glymour and Quine on theoretical equivalence
- How many varieties of cylindric algebras are there
- Logical analysis of relativity theories
- Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic
- Mutual definability does not imply definitional equivalence, a simple example
- Natural deduction and arbitrary objects
- On generalization of definitional equivalence to non-disjoint languages
- On the simplicity of ideas
- Properties Preserved under Definitional Equivalence and Interpretations
- The finitely axiomatizable complete theories of non-associative arrow frames
- The foundations of thermodynamics
- The logical foundations of scientific theories. Languages, structures, and models
- The role of the axiom of induction in elementary arithmetic
Cited in
(9)- TWO-VARIABLE LOGIC HAS WEAK, BUT NOT STRONG, BETH DEFINABILITY
- On generalization of definitional equivalence to non-disjoint languages
- On the networks of large embeddings
- Modal logics that are both monotone and antitone: Makinson's extension results and affinities between logics
- In the Footsteps of Hilbert: The Andréka-Németi Group’s Logical Foundations of Theories in Physics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1954130 (Why is no real title available?)
- From geometry to conceptual relativity
- Distance between physical theories based on information theory
- Distances, diameters and verisimilitude of theories
This page was built for publication: Distances between formal theories
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5117596)