How practical are adaptive designs likely to be for confirmatory trials?

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.200610242MaRDI QIDQ5122853zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors A. Lawrence Gould

Publication date 24 September 2020

Published in Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200610242

zbMATH Keywords

adaptive seamless designadaptive testsclosure principlecombination testsconfirmationestimationhypotheses selectionmultiple testingplanning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Recommendations

• Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: opportunities and limitations
• Plan to be Flexible: A Commentary on Adaptive Designs
• Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations
• Confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design
• Opening the adaptive toolbox

Cited in

(7)

• Editorial -- Adaptive designs: expectations are high
• Application of adaptive designs -- a review
• Confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design
• Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts
• Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations
• Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: opportunities and limitations
• Adaptive vs. group sequential self-designing trials

This page was built for publication: How practical are adaptive designs likely to be for confirmatory trials?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5122853)