How practical are adaptive designs likely to be for confirmatory trials?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5122853
DOI10.1002/BIMJ.200610242zbMATH Open1442.62381OpenAlexW1963500177WikidataQ80261891 ScholiaQ80261891MaRDI QIDQ5122853FDOQ5122853
Authors: A. Lawrence Gould
Publication date: 24 September 2020
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200610242
Recommendations
- Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: opportunities and limitations
- Plan to be Flexible: A Commentary on Adaptive Designs
- Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations
- Confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design
- Opening the adaptive toolbox
planningestimationmultiple testingadaptive testsconfirmationclosure principlecombination testsadaptive seamless designhypotheses selection
Cited In (7)
- Application of adaptive designs -- a review
- Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts
- Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: opportunities and limitations
- Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations
- Editorial -- Adaptive designs: expectations are high
- Confirmatory clinical trials with an adaptive design
- Adaptive vs. group sequential self-designing trials
This page was built for publication: How practical are adaptive designs likely to be for confirmatory trials?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5122853)