A Cautionary Note on Design Implications when the Primary Analysis is a Stratified Analysis of a Binary Endpoint

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.200610291zbMATH Open1442.62312OpenAlexW1969930050WikidataQ51924771 ScholiaQ51924771MaRDI QIDQ5122891FDOQ5122891

Authors: Christy Chuang-Stein 

Publication date: 24 September 2020

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200610291

Recommendations

• Stratified analysis with an application in clinical trials
• Stratified analysis of correlated binary outcome data: a comparison of model dependent and robust tests of significance
• Stratified Analysis in Randomized Trials with Noncompliance
• Analyzing Randomized Dose Finding Studies with a Primary and a Secondary Endpoint
• Balancing tests in stratified randomized controlled trials: a cautionary note
• Efficient principally stratified treatment effect estimation in crossover studies with absorbent binary endpoints
• Longitudinal studies of binary response data following case-control and stratified case-control sampling: design and analysis

zbMATH Keywords

weighted averageCochran-Mantel-Haenszel procedure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cited In (1)

• Stratified analysis with an application in clinical trials

This page was built for publication: A Cautionary Note on Design Implications when the Primary Analysis is a Stratified Analysis of a Binary Endpoint

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5122891)