Statistical mechanics of the US supreme court

DOI10.1007/s10955-015-1253-6zbMath1360.82025arXiv1306.5004OpenAlexW3106017648MaRDI QIDQ513001

Edward D. Lee, Chase P. Broedersz, William Bialek

Publication date: 3 March 2017

Published in: Journal of Statistical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5004

zbMATH Keywords

maximum entropystatistical mechanicssupreme court

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12) Statistical mechanics of random media, disordered materials (including liquid crystals and spin glasses) (82D30) Lattice systems (Ising, dimer, Potts, etc.) and systems on graphs arising in equilibrium statistical mechanics (82B20)

Related Items

A random energy approach to deep learning, Resolution and relevance trade-offs in deep learning, Statistical criticality arises in most informative representations, Partisan intuition belies strong, institutional consensus and wide Zipf's law for voting blocs in US Supreme Court, Maximal relevance and optimal learning machines, Computational geometry and the U.S. Supreme Court

Cites Work

• A Mathematical Theory of Communication
• Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics
• Estimation of Entropy and Mutual Information
• A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item