Comparison of three-level cluster randomized trials using quantile dispersion graphs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5130296
DOI10.1080/02664763.2015.1010491OpenAlexW1971829420MaRDI QIDQ5130296
No author found.
Publication date: 4 November 2020
Published in: Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1010491
Related Items (2)
Some design considerations for cluster randomized trials with binary responses ⋮ Optimal allocation of subjects in a matched pair cluster-randomized trial with fixed number of heterogeneous clusters
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Quantile dispersion graphs for evaluating and comparing designs for logistic regression models
- A graphical approach for evaluating and comparing designs for nonlinear models.
- Comparison of designs for generalized linear models under model misspecification
- Sample Size Estimation in Cluster Randomized Studies with Varying Cluster Size
- Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials
- Comparison of designs for the three-fold nested random model
- Statistical Power and Sample Size Requirements for Three Level Hierarchical Cluster Randomized Trials
- Confidence Intervals for a Variance Ratio, or for Heritability, in an Unbalanced Mixed Linear Model
- Bayesian estimators of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way random effects model
- A prior for the variance in hierarchical models
- Quantile dispersion graphs to compare the efficiencies of cluster randomized designs
- Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (Comment on article by Browne and Draper)
This page was built for publication: Comparison of three-level cluster randomized trials using quantile dispersion graphs