Model misspecification effects for biased samples
From MaRDI portal
Publication:513971
DOI10.1007/S00184-016-0597-5zbMath1361.62014OpenAlexW2515326905MaRDI QIDQ513971
Polychronis Economou, Maria Douli, George Tzavelas
Publication date: 8 March 2017
Published in: Metrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-016-0597-5
misspecificationgeneralized gamma distributionbiased samplingweighted distributioncomplete family of distributions
Related Items (2)
Understanding the sampling bias: a case study on NBA drafts ⋮ Robust inference under r-size-biased sampling without replacement from finite population
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On the effect of misspecifying the density ratio model
- On the gradient statistic under model misspecification
- The indirect method: inference based on intermediate statistics -- a synthesis and examples
- Mis-Specification Analysis Between Normal and Extreme Value Distributions for a Linear Regression Model
- Weighted Distributions and Size-Biased Sampling with Applications to Wildlife Populations and Human Families
- Size-Biased Sampling
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation Under Misspecified Lognormal and Weibull Distributions
- Model Selection Principles in Misspecified Models
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
This page was built for publication: Model misspecification effects for biased samples