Measuring the overall incoherence of credence functions

DOI10.1007/S11229-014-0640-XzbMATH Open1386.60012OpenAlexW2036782322MaRDI QIDQ514110FDOQ514110

Authors: Julia Staffel 

Publication date: 8 March 2017

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0640-x

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5769455
• Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief
• Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation
• Incoherence and inconsistency
• Why be (approximately) coherent?

zbMATH Keywords

coherenceprobabilityBayesianismmeasurecredenceincoherence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Cites Work

• Probabilistic Coherence and Proper Scoring Rules
• Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief
• Aggregating disparate estimates of chance
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Coherence as an ideal of rationality
• HOW SETS OF COHERENT PROBABILITIES MAY SERVE AS MODELS FOR DEGREES OF INCOHERENCE
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Aggregating large sets of probabilistic forecasts by weighted coherent adjustment
• Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation

Cited In (4)

• Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logic: rationality postulates and Dutch book interpretation
• Bayesian coherentism
• The pragmatic encroachment debate
• Fragmentation and logical omniscience

This page was built for publication: Measuring the overall incoherence of credence functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q514110)