A Comparison of Robust Model Choice Criteria Within a Metalearning Study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5141232
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-48814-7_7zbMath1455.62089OpenAlexW3042274331MaRDI QIDQ5141232
Petra Vidnerová, Yeşim Güney, Jan Kalina
Publication date: 18 December 2020
Published in: Analytical Methods in Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48814-7_7
Nonparametric regression and quantile regression (62G08) Nonparametric robustness (62G35) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Regularized linear discriminant analysis and its application in microarrays
- Data complexity meta-features for regression problems
- Three contributions to robust regression diagnostics
- High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression
- The minimum weighted covariance determinant estimator
- Parameter estimation of regression model with AR\((p)\) error terms based on skew distributions with EM algorithm
- Robust and sparse estimators for linear regression models
- Metalearning and algorithm selection: progress, state of the art and introduction to the 2018 special issue
- Measuring the prediction error. A comparison of cross-validation, bootstrap and covariance penalty methods
- Methodology in Robust and Nonparametric Statistics
- Metalearning
- Robust Statistics
- Robust Statistical Methods with R
- A Feature Subset Selection Algorithm Automatic Recommendation Method
- A comparison of robust versions of the AIC based on M-, S- and MM-estimators
- Kernel Based Learning Methods: Regularization Networks and RBF Networks
- Robust Statistics
This page was built for publication: A Comparison of Robust Model Choice Criteria Within a Metalearning Study