Understanding negation implicationally in the relevant logic R
From MaRDI portal
Publication:514515
DOI10.1007/S11225-016-9676-XzbMATH Open1417.03167OpenAlexW2412341804MaRDI QIDQ514515FDOQ514515
Publication date: 2 March 2017
Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-016-9676-x
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The semantics of entailment. II
- Display logic
- Negation in relevant logics. (How I stopped worrying and learned to love the Routley star)
- The Semantics of First Degree Entailment
- Dual intuitionistic logic and a variety of negations: the logic of scientific research
- Negation in the context of gaggle theory
- Proofs, disproofs, and their duals
- Constructive negation, implication, and co-implication
- Relevant logic and the theory of information
- On when a semantics is not a semantics: some reasons for disliking the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic
- The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
- Displaying and deciding substructural logics. I: Logics with contraposition
- A comparative study of various model-theoretic treatments of negation: A history of formal negation
- Defining double negation elimination
- A star-free semantics for R
Cited In (5)
This page was built for publication: Understanding negation implicationally in the relevant logic R
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q514515)
