Impulse control with discontinuous setup costs: discounted cost criterion

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5145605

DOI10.1137/19M1299244zbMATH Open1455.90017arXiv1911.05308OpenAlexW3120005744MaRDI QIDQ5145605FDOQ5145605

Fen Xu, Dacheng Yao, Hanqin Zhang

Publication date: 21 January 2021

Published in: SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This paper studies a continuous-review backlogged inventory model considered by Helmes et al. (2015) but with discontinuous quantity-dependent setup cost for each order. In particular, the setup cost is characterized by a two-step function and a higher cost would be charged once the order quantity exceeds a threshold Q. Unlike the optimality of (s,S)-type policy obtained by Helmes et al. (2015) for continuous setup cost with the discounted cost criterion, we find that, in our model, although some (s,S)-type policy is indeed optimal in some cases, the (s,S)-type policy can not always be optimal. In particular, we show that there exist cases in which an (s,S) policy is optimal for some initial levels but it is strictly worse than a generalized (s,S(x):xleqs) policy for the other initial levels. Under (s,S(x):xleqs) policy, it orders nothing for x>s and orders up to level S(x) for xleqs, where S(x) is a non-constant function of x. We further prove the optimality of such (s,S(x):xleqs) policy in a large subset of admissible policies for those initial levels. Moreover, the optimality is obtained through establishing a more general lower bound theorem which will also be applicable in solving some other optimization problems by the common lower bound approach.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.05308




Recommendations




Cites Work






This page was built for publication: Impulse control with discontinuous setup costs: discounted cost criterion

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5145605)