Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tests when the ``gold standard is unavailable, with application to the cattle Q fever in small ruminants case study
DOI10.6092/ISSN.1973-2201/3545zbMATH Open1453.62603OpenAlexW1665391820MaRDI QIDQ5148441FDOQ5148441
Authors: Dario Basso, Katia Capello, Livio Corain, Luigi Salmaso 
Publication date: 4 February 2021
Full work available at URL: https://doaj.org/article/d17a11bdd506491fbcc71ccf46134ff2
Recommendations
- Evaluation of the accuracy of diagnostic tests from repeated~measurements~without a~gold~standard
- Serodiagnostic tests. Evaluation and interpretation in veterinary medicine and other special fields
- Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects
- Mastitis in dairy production: estimation of sensitivity, specificity and disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard
- Confidence intervals for parameters of two diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard
Diagnostics, and linear inference and regression (62J20) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Cites Work
Cited In (4)
- Serodiagnostic tests. Evaluation and interpretation in veterinary medicine and other special fields
- Evaluation of the accuracy of diagnostic tests from repeated~measurements~without a~gold~standard
- Mastitis in dairy production: estimation of sensitivity, specificity and disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard
- Confidence bounds for the sensitivity lack of a less specific diagnostic test, without gold standard
This page was built for publication: Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tests when the ``gold standard is unavailable, with application to the cattle Q fever in small ruminants case study
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5148441)
