Logistic regression for prospectivity modeling
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-55874-1_81zbMATH Open1475.62215OpenAlexW3158872869MaRDI QIDQ5152880FDOQ5152880
Authors: S. Kost, Oliver Rheinbach, H. Schaeben
Publication date: 27 September 2021
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://tubaf.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A72875/attachment/ATT-0/
Recommendations
- Comparison of mathematical methods of potential modeling
- A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity
- Popular raster-based methods of prospectivity modeling and their relationships
- Choosing the best logistic regression model through the use of a nonparametric regression
- Model performance analysis and model validation in logistic regression
Applications of statistics to economics (62P20) Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12)
Cites Work
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity
- Trust region Newton method for logistic regression
- The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples
- A mathematical view of weights-of-evidence, conditional independence, and logistic regression in terms of Markov random fields
- Applied logistic regression
- Wald's Test as Applied to Hypotheses in Logit Analysis
- Popular raster-based methods of prospectivity modeling and their relationships
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Logistic regression for prospectivity modeling
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5152880)