Pseudo-finite sets, pseudo-o-minimality

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5159489

DOI10.1017/JSL.2020.58zbMATH Open1485.03136arXiv1908.01660OpenAlexW2965225503MaRDI QIDQ5159489FDOQ5159489


Authors: Nadav Meir Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 October 2021

Published in: Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We give an example of two ordered structures M, N in the same language L with the same universe, the same order and admitting the same one-variable definable subsets such that M is a model of the common theory of o-minimal L-structures and N admits a definable, closed, bounded, and discrete subset and a definable injective self-mapping of that subset which is not surjective. This answers negatively two questions by Schoutens; the first being whether there is an axiomatization of the common theory of o-minimal structures in a given language by conditions on one-variable definable sets alone. The second being whether definable completeness and type completeness imply the pigeonhole principle. It also partially answers a question by Fornasiero asking whether definable completeness of an expansion of a real closed field implies the pigeonhole principle.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01660




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Pseudo-finite sets, pseudo-o-minimality

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5159489)