How to have more things by forgetting how to count them

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5161002

DOI10.1098/RSPA.2019.0782zbMATH Open1472.03057arXiv1910.14480OpenAlexW3098143993WikidataQ98613026 ScholiaQ98613026MaRDI QIDQ5161002FDOQ5161002

Asaf Karagila, Philipp Schlicht

Publication date: 29 October 2021

Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Cohen's first model is a model of Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory in which there is a Dedekind-finite set of real numbers, and it is perhaps the most famous model where the Axiom of Choice fails. We force over this model to add a function from this Dedekind-finite set to some infinite ordinal kappa. In the case that we force the function to be injective, it turns out that the resulting model is the same as adding kappa Cohen reals to the ground model, and that we have just added an enumeration of the canonical Dedekind-finite set. In the case where the function is merely surjective it turns out that we do not add any reals, sets of ordinals, or collapse any Dedekind-finite sets. This motivates the question if there is any combinatorial condition on a Dedekind-finite set A which characterises when a forcing will preserve its Dedekind-finiteness or not add new sets of ordinals. We answer this question in the case of "Adding a Cohen subset" by presenting a varied list of conditions each equivalent to the preservation of Dedekind-finiteness. For example, 2A is extremally disconnected, or [A]<omega is Dedekind-finite.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.14480





Cites Work


Cited In (4)






This page was built for publication: How to have more things by forgetting how to count them

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5161002)