Q inversion and comparison of influential factors among three methods: CFS, SR, and AA

DOI10.4208/CICP.OA-2018-0290zbMATH Open1490.74062OpenAlexW3022822200MaRDI QIDQ5162289FDOQ5162289

Authors:

Publication date: 2 November 2021

Published in: Communications in Computational Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0290

Recommendations

• Estimation of quality factor \(Q\) from the instantaneous frequency at the envelope peak of a seismic signal
• A procedure for inverting seismic data to obtain Q-profiles
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1432207
• A stable \(Q\) compensated reverse time migration method based on excitation amplitude imaging condition
• Highly Accurate Inversion Methods for Three-Dimensional Stratified Media

zbMATH Keywords

amplitude attenuationcentroid frequency shiftQ inversionspectral ratiozero-offset VSP data

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Geological problems (86A60) Seismology (including tsunami modeling), earthquakes (86A15) Inverse problems in geophysics (86A22) Inverse problems for waves in solid mechanics (74J25)

Cited In (1)

• Estimation of quality factor \(Q\) from the instantaneous frequency at the envelope peak of a seismic signal

This page was built for publication: Q inversion and comparison of influential factors among three methods: CFS, SR, and AA

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5162289)