Q inversion and comparison of influential factors among three methods: CFS, SR, and AA

DOI10.4208/CICP.OA-2018-0290MaRDI QIDQ5162289zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors

Publication date 2 November 2021

Published in Communications in Computational Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0290

zbMATH Keywords

amplitude attenuationcentroid frequency shiftQ inversionspectral ratiozero-offset VSP data

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Geological problems (86A60) Seismology (including tsunami modeling), earthquakes (86A15) Inverse problems in geophysics (86A22) Inverse problems for waves in solid mechanics (74J25)

Recommendations

• Estimation of quality factor \(Q\) from the instantaneous frequency at the envelope peak of a seismic signal
• A procedure for inverting seismic data to obtain Q-profiles
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1432207
• A stable \(Q\) compensated reverse time migration method based on excitation amplitude imaging condition
• Highly Accurate Inversion Methods for Three-Dimensional Stratified Media

Cited in

(1)

• Estimation of quality factor \(Q\) from the instantaneous frequency at the envelope peak of a seismic signal

This page was built for publication: Q inversion and comparison of influential factors among three methods: CFS, SR, and AA

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5162289)