A Note on the Estimate of Treatment Effect from a Cox Regression Model When the Proportionality Assumption Is Violated
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5201511
Recommendations
- Estimation of treatment effects based on possibly misspecified Cox regression
- Estimation of main effect when covariates have non-proportional hazards
- Cox regression models with proportional baseline hazards applied to lung cancer survival data
- Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5300197
Cites work
- Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals
- Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression model
- Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards
- Estimation of the average hazard ratio
- Martingale-based residuals for survival models
- Misspecified proportional hazard models
- Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
Cited in
(6)- Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards
- Estimation of treatment effects based on possibly misspecified Cox regression
- Estimation of odds of concordance based on the Aalen additive model
- Estimation of main effect when covariates have non-proportional hazards
- Cox regression models with proportional baseline hazards applied to lung cancer survival data
- Adjusted interim survival analysis under nonproportional hazards
This page was built for publication: A Note on the Estimate of Treatment Effect from a Cox Regression Model When the Proportionality Assumption Is Violated
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5201511)