Factorization method versus migration imaging in a waveguide

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5204634

DOI10.1088/1361-6420/AB2C9BzbMATH Open1458.35472arXiv1903.08146OpenAlexW3098628460WikidataQ127616907 ScholiaQ127616907MaRDI QIDQ5204634FDOQ5204634


Authors: L. Borcea, S. Meng Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 5 December 2019

Published in: Inverse Problems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We present a comparative study of two qualitative imaging methods in an acoustic waveguide with sound hard walls. The waveguide terminates at one end and contains unknown obstacles of compact support, to be determined from data gathered by an array of sensors that probe the obstacles with waves and measure the scattered response. The first imaging method, known as the factorization method, is based on the factorization of the far field operator. It is designed to image at single frequency and estimates the support of the obstacles by a Picard range criterion. The second imaging method, known as migration, works either with one or multiple frequencies. It forms an image by backpropagating the measured scattered wave to the search points, using the Green's function in the empty waveguide. We study the connection between these methods with analysis and numerical simulations.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08146




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (12)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Factorization method versus migration imaging in a waveguide

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5204634)