Recognizing union-find trees is NP-complete, even without rank info
DOI10.1142/S0129054119400276zbMATH Open1427.68059OpenAlexW2974852703WikidataQ127227329 ScholiaQ127227329MaRDI QIDQ5205041FDOQ5205041
Authors: Kitti Gelle, Szabolcs Iván
Publication date: 10 December 2019
Published in: International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129054119400276
Recommendations
Data structures (68P05) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17)
Cites Work
- Introduction to algorithms
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Efficiency of a Good But Not Linear Set Union Algorithm
- Unification: a multidisciplinary survey
- Reverse engineering prefix tables
- Certifying algorithms
- Counting Parameterized Border Arrays for a Binary Alphabet
- Words over an ordered alphabet and suffix permutations
- Inferring strings from suffix trees and links on a binary alphabet
- On the combinatorics of suffix arrays
- Border array on bounded alphabet
- Cover array string reconstruction
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2003
- Efficient validation and construction of border arrays and validation of string matching automata
- An improved equivalence algorithm
- Verifying and enumerating parameterized border arrays
- Recognizing union-find trees is NP-complete
- Experimental algorithmics. From algorithm design to robust and efficient software
- Validating the Knuth-Morris-Pratt failure function, fast and online
- A suffix tree or not a suffix tree?
- The recognition of union trees
Cited In (5)
This page was built for publication: Recognizing union-find trees is NP-complete, even without rank info
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5205041)