Against reflective equilibrium for logical theorizing

DOI10.26686/AJL.V16I7.5927zbMATH Open1456.03018OpenAlexW2949278157MaRDI QIDQ5205987FDOQ5205987

Authors: Jack Woods 

Publication date: 17 December 2019

Published in: The Australasian Journal of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v16i7.5927

Recommendations

• Logical anti-exceptionalism and theoretical equivalence
• On the very idea of choosing a logic: the role of the background logic
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7307072
• Full-blooded anti-exceptionalism about logic
• What counts as evidence for a logical theory?

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cited In (5)

• Logical abductivism and non-deductive inference
• Why classical logic is privileged: justification of logics based on translatability
• The cost of closure: logical realism, anti-exceptionalism, and theoretical equivalence
• Logical anti-exceptionalism and theoretical equivalence
• Meaning-preserving translations of non-classical logics into classical logic: between pluralism and monism

This page was built for publication: Against reflective equilibrium for logical theorizing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5205987)