What accuracy could not be

DOI10.1093/BJPS/AXX032MaRDI QIDQ5210645zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Graham Oddie

Publication date 21 January 2020

Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/13105/1/What%20accuracy%20could%20not%20be_Oddie.pdf

IPFS File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Recommendations

• Repugnant accuracy
• Strict propriety is weak
• Accuracy and epistemic conservatism
• The content, consequence and likeness approaches to verisimilitude: compatibility, trivialization, and underdetermination
• The value of truth: a reply to Howson

Cited in

(9)

• Fallibilism, verisimilitude, and the preface paradox
• Accuracy, conditionalization, and probabilism
• Scoring, truthlikeness, and value
• Truthlikeness for probabilistic laws
• Propositional and credal accuracy in an indeterministic world
• Approaching probabilistic laws
• Approaching deterministic and probabilistic truth: a unified account
• Approaching probabilistic truths: introduction to the topical collection
• New semantics for Bayesian inference: the interpretive problem and its solutions

This page was built for publication: What accuracy could not be

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5210645)