Defending Maddy's mathematical naturalism from Roland's criticisms: the role of mathematical depth

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-10434-8_12zbMATH Open1429.03029OpenAlexW45562918MaRDI QIDQ5213634FDOQ5213634

Authors: Marina Imocrante 

Publication date: 4 February 2020

Published in: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10434-8_12

Recommendations

• Maddy and Mathematics: Naturalism or Not
• Mathematical, Astrological, and Theological Naturalism
• Objectivity over objects: A case study in theory formation
• THE CATEGORICAL NATURE OF MATHEMATICAL COGNITION
• Naturalism and Ontology

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30)

Cites Work

• Second philosophy. A naturalistic method
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• PENELOPE MADDY. Defending the Axioms: On the Philosophical Foundations of Set Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-959618-8 (hbk); 978-0-19-967148-9 (pbk). Pp. x + 150
• Defending the axioms. On the philosophical foundations of set theory
• Maddy and Mathematics: Naturalism or Not

Cited In (4)

• Conjoining mathematical empiricism with mathematical realism: Maddy's account of set perception revisited
• Set-theoretic justification and the theoretical virtues
• Virtue theory of mathematical practices: an introduction
• Maddy and Mathematics: Naturalism or Not

This page was built for publication: Defending Maddy's mathematical naturalism from Roland's criticisms: the role of mathematical depth

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5213634)