Causal comparative effectiveness analysis of dynamic continuous‐time treatment initiation rules with sparsely measured outcomes and death
DOI10.1111/BIOM.13018zbMATH Open1436.62568arXiv1904.01668OpenAlexW2951906289WikidataQ91025232 ScholiaQ91025232MaRDI QIDQ5214532FDOQ5214532
Publication date: 7 February 2020
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01668
marginal structural modelmultiple imputationinverse weightingelectronic health recordshuman immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Reliability and life testing (62N05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Cited In (8)
- Impact of discretization of the timeline for longitudinal causal inference methods
- Triplet Matching for Estimating Causal Effects With Three Treatment Arms: A Comparative Study of Mortality by Trauma Center Level
- A new method for clustered survival data: estimation of treatment effect heterogeneity and variable selection
- Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data using machine learning
- Estimating the optimal timing of surgery by imputing potential outcomes
- Assessing heterogeneity in treatment initiation guidelines in longitudinal randomized controlled trials
- Estimation of the marginal effect of antidepressants on body mass index under confounding and endogenous covariate-driven monitoring times
- A flexible sensitivity analysis approach for unmeasured confounding with multiple treatments and a binary outcome with application to SEER-Medicare lung cancer data
This page was built for publication: Causal comparative effectiveness analysis of dynamic continuous‐time treatment initiation rules with sparsely measured outcomes and death
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5214532)