Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence

DOI10.1111/BMSP.12168MaRDI QIDQ5215423zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Ricardo Primi, Daniel Santos, Filip de Fruyt, Oliver John

Publication date 10 February 2020

Published in British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12168

zbMATH Keywords

acquiescencemultidimensional item response theorypersonality assessmentrandom intercept modelresponse styles

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25)

Recommendations

• Acquiescent responding in balanced multidimensional scales and exploratory factor analysis
• Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles
• Social science measurement by means of item response models
• Model-based measures for detecting and quantifying response bias
• Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: a review and tutorial

Cited in

(2)

• Linearity, symmetry, and equidistance in semantic differential scales for measuring images of self and images of others
• A psychometric model for respondent‐level anchoring on self‐report rating scale instruments

This page was built for publication: Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5215423)