Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5215684
DOI10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-181zbMATH Open1430.68299MaRDI QIDQ5215684FDOQ5215684
Authors: Dorothea Baumeister, Daniel Neugebauer, Jörg Rothe 
Publication date: 12 February 2020
Recommendations
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Complexity of Possible and Necessary Existence Problems in Abstract Argumentation
- Verification in attack-incomplete argumentation frameworks
Cited In (16)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Verification in attack-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Logics in Artificial Intelligence
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks
- A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks
- If nothing is accepted -- repairing argumentation frameworks
- Manipulating skeptical and credulous consequences when merging beliefs
- Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic
- On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation
- I don't care, I don't know \(\dots \) I know too much! on incompleteness and undecidedness in abstract argumentation
- Abstract argumentation frameworks with fallible evidence
This page was built for publication: Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5215684)
