An improvement of the general bound on the largest family of subsets avoiding a subposet
From MaRDI portal
Publication:523149
DOI10.1007/S11083-016-9390-3zbMATH Open1404.06003arXiv1408.5783OpenAlexW1682909341MaRDI QIDQ523149FDOQ523149
Authors: Dániel Grósz, Abhishek Methuku, Casey Tompkins
Publication date: 20 April 2017
Published in: Order (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Let be the maximum size of a family of subsets of not containing as a (weak) subposet, and let be the length of a longest chain in . The best known upper bound for in terms of and is due to Chen and Li, who showed that for any fixed . In this paper we show that for any fixed , improving the best known upper bound. By choosing appropriately, we obtain that as a corollary, which we show is best possible for general . We also give a different proof of this corollary by using bounds for generalized diamonds. We also show that the Lubell function of a family of subsets of not containing as an induced subposet is for every .
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5783
Recommendations
- A note on the largest size of families of sets with a forbidden poset
- Families of subsets without a given poset in double chains and Boolean lattices
- Poset-free families and Lubell-boundedness
- On families of subsets with a forbidden subposet
- An upper bound on the size of diamond-free families of sets
Cites Work
- A Dual of Dilworth's Decomposition Theorem
- Extensions of the linear bound in the Füredi-Hajnal conjecture
- Excluded permutation matrices and the Stanley-Wilf conjecture
- On a lemma of Littlewood and Offord
- Set families with a forbidden subposet
- No four subsets forming an \(N\)
- Largest families without an \(r\)-fork
- Largest family without \(A \cup B \subseteq C \cap D\)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Diamond-free families
- On crown-free families of subsets
- A note on the largest size of families of sets with a forbidden poset
- The method of double chains for largest families with excluded subposets
- Forbidden Hypermatrices Imply General Bounds on Induced Forbidden Subposet Problems
- Induced and non-induced forbidden subposet problems
- Poset-free families and Lubell-boundedness
Cited In (14)
- The largest family of subsets satisfying sequential-evaluation convergence
- A note on the largest size of families of sets with a forbidden poset
- Forbidden induced subposets of given height
- Families of subsets without a given poset in double chains and Boolean lattices
- Largest family without a pair of posets on consecutive levels of the Boolean lattice
- Poset-free families and Lubell-boundedness
- On forbidden poset problems in the linear lattice
- An upper bound on the size of diamond-free families of sets
- Poset Ramsey numbers: large Boolean lattice versus a fixed poset
- The method of double chains for largest families with excluded subposets
- Forbidden Hypermatrices Imply General Bounds on Induced Forbidden Subposet Problems
- Boolean algebras and Lubell functions
- Ramsey numbers for partially-ordered sets
- Forbidden subposet problems with size restrictions
This page was built for publication: An improvement of the general bound on the largest family of subsets avoiding a subposet
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q523149)