When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration

DOI10.1111/BMSP.12146MaRDI QIDQ5234432zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Marie-Ann Sengewald, Peter M. Steiner, Steffi Pohl

Publication date 26 September 2019

Published in British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12146

zbMATH Keywords

average causal treatment effect (ATE)causal effectcovariatesmeasurement error

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA) (62J10) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Recommendations

• Compensation and amplification of attenuation bias in causal effect estimates
• Treatment effect estimation with covariate measurement error
• Bayesian approach for addressing differential covariate measurement error in propensity score methods
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209978
• Identification of causal effects with latent confounding and classical additive errors in treatment

Cited in

(5)

• Bayesian approach for addressing differential covariate measurement error in propensity score methods
• Compensation and amplification of attenuation bias in causal effect estimates
• Treatment effect estimation with covariate measurement error
• On the estimation accuracy of causal effects using supplementary variables
• A semiparametric method for evaluating causal effects in the presence of error‐prone covariates

This page was built for publication: When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5234432)