Spijker's example and its extension

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-11539-5_40MaRDI QIDQ5235307zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Miklós Emil Mincsovics

Publication date 10 October 2019

Published in Finite Difference Methods. Theory and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09485

zbMATH Keywords

linear multistep methodsSpijker normstability

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L05) Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations (65L06) Stability and convergence of numerical methods for ordinary differential equations (65L20)

Abstract: Strongly and weakly stable linear multistep methods can behave very differently. The latter class can produce spurious oscillations in some of the cases for which the former class works flawlessly. The main question is if we can find a well defined property which clearly tells the difference between them. There are many explanations from different viewpoints. We cite Spijker's example which shows that the explicit two step midpoint method is unstable with respect to the Spijker norm. We show that this result can be extended for the general weakly stable case.

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3980397
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4199537
• On the relation between stability and contractivity
• DYNAMICS OF LINEAR MULTISTEP METHODS FOR DELAY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
• Strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and linear multistep methods

Cited in

(4)

• Discrete C^1 convergence of linear multistep methods
• On Paszkiewicz's example
• Exceptional point in a simple textbook example
• Note on Weakly and Strongly Stable Linear Multistep Methods

This page was built for publication: Spijker's example and its extension

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5235307)