Mutations of Splitting Maximal Modifying Modules: The Case of Reflexive Polygons
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5243295
Abstract: It is known that every three dimensional Gorenstein toric singularity has a crepant resolution. Although it is not unique, all crepant resolutions are connected by repeating the operation "flop". On the other hand, this singularity also has a non-commutative crepant resolution (= NCCR) which is constructed from a consistent dimer model. Such an NCCR is given as the endomorphism ring of a certain module which we call splitting maximal modifying module. In this paper, we show that all splitting maximal modifying modules are connected by repeating the operation "mutation" of splitting maximal modifying modules for the case of toric singularities associated with reflexive polygons.
Recommendations
- Corrigendum: “Mutations of Splitting Maximal Modifying Modules: The Case of Reflexive Polygons”
- Mutations of splitting maximal modifying modules arising from dimer models
- Mutation in triangulated categories and rigid Cohen-Macaulay modules
- On mutation of \(\tau\)-tilting modules
- On mutation of {\tau}-tilting modules
- The splitting of finitely generated modules
- A modular interpretation of the trianguline variety
- Modular adjacency algebras of dual polar schemes
- Almost Split Conflations for Complexes of Modules
- Splitting in integral extensions, Cohen-Macaulay modules and algebras
Cited in
(8)- Remarks on non-commutative crepant resolutions of complete intersections
- Mutations of noncommutative crepant resolutions in geometric invariant theory
- Semi-steady non-commutative crepant resolutions via regular dimer models
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7661097 (Why is no real title available?)
- Conic divisorial ideals of Hibi rings and their applications to non-commutative crepant resolutions
- Mutations of splitting maximal modifying modules arising from dimer models
- Deformations of dimer models
- Singular derived categories of \(\mathbb{Q}\)-factorial terminalizations and maximal modification algebras
This page was built for publication: Mutations of Splitting Maximal Modifying Modules: The Case of Reflexive Polygons
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5243295)