Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories

DOI10.1007/S10472-015-9484-4zbMATH Open1380.03011OpenAlexW2216527696MaRDI QIDQ524939FDOQ524939

Authors: Gregor Betz 

Publication date: 27 April 2017

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9484-4

Recommendations

• Epistemic argumentation framework: theory and computation
• Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
• Metalogical contributions to the nonmonotonic theory of abstract argumentation
• Metalevel argumentation

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationrationalityargumentation frameworksnormativity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A textbook of belief dynamics. Theory change and database updating
• On inference from inconsistent premisses
• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
• A logic for default reasoning
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• A brief comparison of Pollock's defeasible reasoning and ranking functions
• The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates

Cited In (1)

• Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement

Uses Software

• Carneades

This page was built for publication: Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q524939)