New Horn rules for probabilistic consequence: is O+ enough?

DOI10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_9MaRDI QIDQ5250310zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors James Hawthorne

Publication date 19 May 2015

Published in David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_9

zbMATH Keywords

Horn rulenonmonotonic consequenceprobabilistic consequence relationprobability threshold

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Recommendations

• O IS NOT ENOUGH
• The quantitative/qualitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference
• Lossy inference rules and their bounds: a brief review
• Some contributions to nonmonotonic consequence
• Nonmonotonic conditionals that behave like conditional probabilities above a threshold

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4104920 (Why is no real title available?)
• Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
• O IS NOT ENOUGH
• On the logic of nonmonotonic conditionals and conditional probabilities
• The quantitative/qualitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference

Cited in

(5)

• O IS NOT ENOUGH
• Lossy inference rules and their bounds: a brief review
• Strengthened conditionals
• Definable conditionals
• Conditionals, support and connexivity

This page was built for publication: New Horn rules for probabilistic consequence: is O+ enough?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5250310)