Shrieking against gluts: the solution to the `just true' problem

DOI10.1093/ANALYS/ANT057MaRDI QIDQ5251306zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jc Beall

Publication date 20 May 2015

Published in Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://semanticscholar.org/paper/c9163b686989bdd5f45aba46ab59640744fdf787

zbMATH Keywords

glut theoryliar paradoxlogicnon-classical logicparaconsistencyparaconsistent logicparadoxtruth theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Recommendations

• Shrieking in the face of vengeance
• On the metatheory for paraconsistent truth
• Paradox, truth and logic. I. Paradox and truth
• Denial and disagreement
• Dissolving the paradoxicality paradox

Cited in

(13)

• Paradox and logical revision. A short introduction
• Denial and disagreement
• An epistemic approach to paraconsistency: a logic of evidence and truth
• Shrieking, shrugging, and the Australian plan
• DLEAC: a dialetheic logic with exclusive assumptions and conclusions
• Shrieking in the face of vengeance
• On gluts in mathematics and science
• A recovery operator for nontransitive approaches
• The signalman against the glut and gap theorists
• God, Gluts and Gaps: Examining an Islamic Traditionalist Case for a Contradictory Theology
• A SIMPLE SEQUENT SYSTEM FOR MINIMALLY INCONSISTENT LP
• Against classical paraconsistent metatheory
• A note on the strength of paraconsistent arithmetic

This page was built for publication: Shrieking against gluts: the solution to the `just true' problem

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5251306)