Effective degrees of freedom: a flawed metaphor

DOI10.1093/biomet/asv019zbMath1452.62251arXiv1312.7851OpenAlexW2103299849WikidataQ36676425 ScholiaQ36676425MaRDI QIDQ5258436

Lucas Janson, William Fithian, Trevor Hastie

Publication date: 26 June 2015

Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7851

zbMATH Keywords

model complexityoptimismnumber of parameters

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonparametric estimation (62G05)

Related Items (8)

P-splines with an \(\ell_1\) penalty for repeated measures ⋮ Variable Selection With Second-Generation P-Values ⋮ Some models are useful, but how do we know which ones? Towards a unified Bayesian model taxonomy ⋮ Best subset, forward stepwise or Lasso? Analysis and recommendations based on extensive comparisons ⋮ On Degrees of Freedom of Projection Estimators With Applications to Multivariate Nonparametric Regression ⋮ Comparing six shrinkage estimators with large sample theory and asymptotically optimal prediction intervals ⋮ Excess Optimism: How Biased is the Apparent Error of an Estimator Tuned by SURE? ⋮ Best linear estimation via minimization of relative mean squared error

This page was built for publication: Effective degrees of freedom: a flawed metaphor