Bandits with switching costs, T^2/3 regret

DOI10.1145/2591796.2591868zbMATH Open1315.68207arXiv1310.2997OpenAlexW2109690147MaRDI QIDQ5259581FDOQ5259581

Authors: Ofer Dekel, Jian Ding, Tomer Koren, Yuval Peres 

Publication date: 26 June 2015

Published in: Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study the adversarial multi-armed bandit problem in a setting where the player incurs a unit cost each time he switches actions. We prove that the player's $T$-round minimax regret in this setting is $widetildeTheta(T^{2/3})$, thereby closing a fundamental gap in our understanding of learning with bandit feedback. In the corresponding full-information version of the problem, the minimax regret is known to grow at a much slower rate of $Theta(sqrtT)$. The difference between these two rates provides the emph{first} indication that learning with bandit feedback can be significantly harder than learning with full-information feedback (previous results only showed a different dependence on the number of actions, but not on $T$.) In addition to characterizing the inherent difficulty of the multi-armed bandit problem with switching costs, our results also resolve several other open problems in online learning. One direct implication is that learning with bandit feedback against bounded-memory adaptive adversaries has a minimax regret of $widetildeTheta(T^{2/3})$. Another implication is that the minimax regret of online learning in adversarial Markov decision processes (MDPs) is $widetildeTheta(T^{2/3})$. The key to all of our results is a new randomized construction of a multi-scale random walk, which is of independent interest and likely to prove useful in additional settings.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.2997

Recommendations

• Online learning over a finite action set with limited switching
• Multi-armed Bandits with Metric Switching Costs
• Better algorithms for benign bandits
• Algorithmic Learning Theory
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6253908

zbMATH Keywords

lower boundsmulti-armed banditswitching costsonline learning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05) Online algorithms; streaming algorithms (68W27) Randomized algorithms (68W20) Sums of independent random variables; random walks (60G50) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26)

Cites Work

• Theory of Cryptography
• On the geometry of differential privacy
• Interactive privacy via the median mechanism
• The price of privately releasing contingency tables and the spectra of random matrices with correlated rows
• Lower bounds in differential privacy
• Iterative Constructions and Private Data Release
• Differential privacy and the fat-shattering dimension of linear queries
• Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy Via Distributed Noise Generation
• On the complexity of differentially private data release, efficient algorithms and hardness results
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data
• Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2004
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• New Efficient Attacks on Statistical Disclosure Control Mechanisms
• Bounds on the sample complexity for private learning and private data release
• Answering \(n^{2+o(1)}\) counting queries with differential privacy is hard
• Characterizing the sample complexity of private learners
• Faster algorithms for privately releasing marginals
• Faster private release of marginals on small databases
• Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacy
• Efficient algorithms for privately releasing marginals via convex relaxations

Cited In (6)

• Multi-armed Bandits with Metric Switching Costs
• Average optimality in a Poissonian bandit with switching arms
• Constrained no-regret learning
• Online learning over a finite action set with limited switching
• Chasing Ghosts: Competing with Stateful Policies
• Sharp dichotomies for regret minimization in metric spaces

Uses Software

• SuLQ

This page was built for publication: Bandits with switching costs, \(T^{2/3}\) regret

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5259581)