How to unify Russellian and Strawsonian definite descriptions

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_7MaRDI QIDQ5259658zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Marie Duží

Publication date 29 June 2015

Published in Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_7

zbMATH Keywords

definite descriptionstransparent intensional logicpresupposition versus entailmenttopic-focus

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1690090
• On the Philosophical foundations of free description theory
• Definite descriptions
• Ghosts, murderers, and the semantics of descriptions
• Descriptions: Frege and Russell combined

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 43055 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3051936 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3077139 (Why is no real title available?)
• Predication and extensionalization
• Procedural semantics for hyperintensional logic. Foundations and applications of transparent intensional logic

Cited in

(7)

• Descriptions: Frege and Russell combined
• Coalescent theories and divergent paraphrases: definites, non-extensional contexts, and familiarity
• Ghosts, murderers, and the semantics of descriptions
• Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions*
• Knowing who occupies an office: purely contingent, necessary and impossible offices
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1690090 (Why is no real title available?)
• Iterated privation and positive predication

This page was built for publication: How to unify Russellian and Strawsonian definite descriptions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5259658)