In good company? On Hume's principle and the assignment of numbers to infinite concepts
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- ``Neo-logicist logic is not epistemically innocent
- An Aristotelian notion of size
- Cardinality, counting, and equinumerosity
- Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction
- Finitude and Hume's principle
- Frege's conception of logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3829861 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1090730 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1868658 (Why is no real title available?)
- Hume’s Principle and the Number of all Objects
- Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: was Cantor's theory of infinite number inevitable?
- Notions of invariance for abstraction principles
- Numerosities of labelled sets: A new way of counting
- On finite Hume
- Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism
- The Mathematical Import of Zermelo's Well-Ordering Theorem
- The State of the Economy: Neo-logicism and Inflationt
Cited in
(12)- Hume's big brother: Counting concepts and the bad company objection
- Bad company objection to Joongol Kim's adverbial theory of numbers
- The adverbial theory of numbers: some clarifications
- Hume's principle: a plea for austerity
- Nothing matters too much, or Wright is wrong
- Abstraction and infinity
- Logicism and the problem of infinity: the number of numbers
- Identity and the cognitive value of logical equations in Frege's foundational project
- Is Hume’s Principle analytic?
- Cantor's Abstractionism and Hume's Principle
- A justification for the quantificational Hume principle
- Frege on the introduction of real and complex numbers by abstraction and cross-sortal identity claims
This page was built for publication: In good company? On Hume's principle and the assignment of numbers to infinite concepts
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5259728)