Comparison of pseudorandom numbers generators and chaotic numbers generators used in differential evolution

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-07401-6_11MaRDI QIDQ5259757zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Lenka Skanderova, Adam Řehoř

Publication date 29 June 2015

Published in Nostradamus 2014: Prediction, Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07401-6_11

zbMATH Keywords

differential evolutionconvergencenumerical examplesglobal minimumevolutionary algorithmchaotic numbers generatorspseudorandom numbers generators

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Random number generation in numerical analysis (65C10) Numerical mathematical programming methods (65K05) Stochastic programming (90C15)

Recommendations

• Chaos level measurement in logistic map used as the chaotic numbers generator in differential evolution
• A comparative study of some pseudorandom number generators
• A comparative computational study of random number generators
• A new pseudo-random number generator based on two chaotic maps
• Pseudorandom number generators based on chaotic dynamical systems

Cited in

(4)

• On the comparison of initialisation strategies in differential evolution for large scale optimisation
• A visual analysis method of randomness for classifying and ranking pseudo-random number generators
• Chaos level measurement in logistic map used as the chaotic numbers generator in differential evolution
• Do evolutionary algorithms indeed require random numbers? Extended study

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• VisualStudio.NET
• MersenneTwister

This page was built for publication: Comparison of pseudorandom numbers generators and chaotic numbers generators used in differential evolution

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5259757)