Some Results About Standardization for a Non Confounder in Estimators of (log) Relative Risk

DOI10.1080/03610926.2013.769599zbMATH Open1321.62138OpenAlexW2023736075MaRDI QIDQ5265845FDOQ5265845

Xueli Wang, Xiao-Hua Zhou

Publication date: 29 July 2015

Published in: Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2013.769599

zbMATH Keywords

relative riskconfoundingstandardizationprecisionnon confounder

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical epidemiology (92C60) Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.) (62H20)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The foundations of confounding in epidemiology
• Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference
• Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: The Adequacy of the Control Group as a Measure of Confounding
• Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models
• The Expected Value and Variance of the Reciprocal and Other Negative Powers of a Positive Bernoullian Variate
• Relations among homogeneity, collapsibility and nonconfounding in distribution effects
• Criteria for Confounders in Epidemiological Studies
• Case-control studies: Assessing the effect of a confounding factor
• Matching and design efficiency in epidemiological studies

Cited In (2)

• A general formulation for standardization of rates as a method to control confounding by measured and unmeasured disease risk factors
• Title not available (Why is that?)

This page was built for publication: Some Results About Standardization for a Non Confounder in Estimators of (log) Relative Risk

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5265845)