On the application of McDiarmid's inequality to complex systems

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5269861

DOI10.1137/130933125zbMATH Open1378.60051arXiv1308.3304OpenAlexW2963432339MaRDI QIDQ5269861FDOQ5269861


Authors: Timothy C. Wallstrom Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 June 2017

Published in: SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: McDiarmid's inequality has recently been proposed as a tool for setting margin requirements for complex systems. If F is the bounded output of a complex system, depending on a vector of n bounded inputs, this inequality provides a bound BF(epsilon), such that the probability of a deviation exceeding BF(epsilon) is less than epsilon. I compare this bound with the absolute bound, based on the range of F. I show that when neff, the effective number of independent variates, is small, and when epsilon is small, the absolute bound is smaller than BF(epsilon), while also providing a smaller probability of exceeding the bound, i.e., zero instead of epsilon. Thus, for BF(epsilon) to be useful, the number of inputs must be large, with a small dependence on any single input, which is consistent with the usual guidance for application of concentration-of-measure results. When the number of inputs is small, or when a small number of inputs account for much of the uncertainty, the absolute bounds will provide better results. The use of absolute bounds is equivalent to the original formulation of the method of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties (QMU).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3304




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: On the application of McDiarmid's inequality to complex systems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5269861)