Logical disputes and the \textit{a priori}

DOI10.2143/LEA.236.0.3186061MaRDI QIDQ5283788zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Graham Priest

Publication date 25 July 2017

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2143/LEA.236.0.3186061

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Some uses of logic in rigorous philosophy
• Logical disagreement and aggregation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4127178
• Logic, mathematics, and the \textit{a priori}. I: A problem for realism
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2076263

Cited in

(22)

• A puzzle about disputes and disagreements
• The defeater version of Benacerraf's problem for a priori knowledge
• Contradictory concepts
• The Possibility and Fruitfulness of a Debate on the Principle of Non-contradiction
• Hegel and Priest on revising logic
• Priest’s Anti-Exceptionalism, Candrakīrti and Paraconsistency
• Some Comments and Replies
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6741934 (Why is no real title available?)
• Logical abductivism and non-deductive inference
• Logic and science: science and logic
• Anti-exceptionalism, truth and the BA-plan
• The cost of closure: logical realism, anti-exceptionalism, and theoretical equivalence
• Why classical logic is privileged: justification of logics based on translatability
• Logic as applied mathematics -- with particular application to the notion of logical form
• Logical abductivism on abductive logic
• Anti-exceptionalism about logic: an overview
• Anti-exceptionalism about logic as tradition rejection
• Choice in the iterative conception of set
• Three approaches to logical correctness
• On logical and scientific strength
• On the relationship between logic's neutrality and theory closure
• Logical predictivism

This page was built for publication: Logical disputes and the \textit{a priori}

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5283788)